Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/8280Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Huseynov, Vasif | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-05T12:13:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-03-05T12:13:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2709-1848 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2709-1856 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12323/8280 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | For much of the post-Cold War period, the South Caucasus was shaped by a distinct geopolitical logic in which unresolved conflicts functioned as instruments of external influence, connectivity was constrained, and stability was underpinned by interim security mechanisms and contested political arrangements, not by durable peace agreements. This old geopolitics did not seek resolution; it sought control. Frozen or semi-frozen conflicts allowed external actors—above all Russia—to arbitrate outcomes, limit regional autonomy, and preserve leverage by keeping borders politically charged and economically inert. Order was produced not through integration or enforcement, but through managed ambiguity. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol. 9;Baku Dialogues, № 2 | - |
| dc.subject | TRIPP | en_US |
| dc.subject | South Caucasus | en_US |
| dc.title | Slipping Out of ‘Old Geopolitics’ Through TRIPP | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bd-v9-n2-winter-2025-2026_vasif_huseynov.pdf | 711.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.